Boston Celtics Using Length for Positionless Basketball
The Boston Celtics are trending towards positionless basketball, but are looking for more length, similar to the Bucks
With pieces like Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Semi Ojeleye, Jae Crowder, and Gordon Hayward, the Boston Celtics are evolving into a team without positions. Last season, we saw Avery Bradley become a top rebounder for the green team, Crowder played the 3 and the 4, and even Smart showcase some play in the post.
This year, we have a draft class stocked with versatile players who can do a little bit of everything. Based on summer league performances, Tatum and Ojeleye can score and rebound at the 3 or 4, with Ojeleye appearing to be more of a “3 and D” player. Of course, we can’t talk about next season without adding in the contributions Hayward will provide on both ends of the floor.
Headlining the move toward position-less basketball are teams like the Golden State Warriors and Milwaukee Bucks. The former being the ultimate position-less model with two championships in hand, and the latter rising through the NBA ranks as a matchup nightmare (read: Giannis Antetokounmpo).
Danny Ainge deserves praise for his decision to not try to mimic the champion Warriors, and instead following the Bucks model. It’s nearly impossible to find another Curry, Green, or Durant. However, it is possible to find skilled, versatile players with length like the Bucks have done.
More from Hardwood Houdini
- Boston Celtics’ two-way contract decision will be made after training camp
- Proposed trade sends Boston Celtics playoff killer to the Cs from rival
- ‘Face of Germany’s stunning run’ in FIBA World Cup not the only ex-Boston Celtics player to win gold
- Proposed Boston Celtics trade target pitched for reunion with fired coach
- Battle For Banner 18: Will Boston Celtics battle historical foe in 2024 Finals?
To his credit, Ainge has certainly found skilled, versatile players with length. He has assembled a roster that should be taller (and more skilled) than the 2016 team.
With FiveThirtyEight measuring the 2016 Celtics as the shortest team in the league, and our two aforementioned opponents as the tallest, Ainge’s new acquisitions can only help the height problem.
The added length and versatility will help the Celtics more easily switch on defense and create matchup problems when they run their sets on offense. Envision Tatum playing the 2 during the upcoming season and hitting opposing guards with his turnaround fade-away at the top of the key. Deadly.
The Celtics aren’t shy about their plans to become a longer, more skilled team. Per CSNNE, Brad Stevens said, “the way I look at it, you’re a ball-handler, a wing, a guy that can play 3 or 4 or you’re a big. I don’t have five positions anymore.”
Minus Isaiah Thomas, the Celtics could start lineup of quality players all over the height of 6’4″, assuming Marcus Smart is the primary ball-handler. Furthermore, with Thomas as your starting primary ball-handler, we could see Brown at the 2 which would create a big, skilled, versatile lineup.
The comparison to the Bucks is only in terms of length. The Celtics should be able to beat the Bucks next season. Beating the Warriors will be much harder, though the Celtics have given the Warriors trouble in the past.
Next: Celtics Aiming for Positionless Basketball
It is the Celtics matchup with the Cleveland Cavaliers where the roster additions should help. Between the turmoil in their front office and lack of young players, it is only a matter a time before the Celtics take the torch as the class of the east.